Our project 's objective is to create a body of knowledge for the discipline of competitive intelligence.

 

Recent Activity
There has been no activity from other users in the past 30 days.

RSS Feed

 

Last Modified By: John Prescott / Jun 24, 2008, 3:21pm 
Compare Current Version of Page With:
  •             ver.10 1% chg by: John Prescott / Jun 24
  •             ver.9 14% chg by: John Prescott / Jun 24
  •             ver.8 4% chg by: John Prescott / Jun 24
  •             ver.7 7% chg by: John Prescott / Jun 7
  •             ver.6 4% chg by: John Prescott / Jun 7
  •             ver.5 5% chg by: John Prescott / Jun 7
  •             ver.4 1% chg by: Richard Herko / Jun 7
  •             ver.3 8% chg by: John Prescott / Dec 10
  •             ver.2 6% chg by: John Prescott / Dec 8
  •             ver.1 0% chg by: John Prescott / Dec 8
Page ActionsWorkspace Actions

Page Comments:
Made on Revision 4Comment by John Prescott on Feb 10, 10:52am:

We are looking for comments and suggestions regarding the development of a body of knowledge for the field of competitive intelligence.

Made on Revision 4Comment by Anonymous User on Feb 15, 1:30pm:

I would like to see the next version

Made on Current VersionComment by Anonymous User on Jul 29, 8:37am:

John, this is excellent. My name is Pieter, and I am also on the CI Ning network. In 2007 I started to create a body of knowledge (now going into a wiki) of CI customised for our company community. Over time I will be priveledged to have our CI community contribute to this great effort of yours. My personal focus is in two areas, and I would like to venture that they should feature prominently in such a BOK, since either of them gone wrong can have negative effects:

 

 

 

1. The effective management of CI, knowing that it is a potential area of controversy. Taking any risks into account of over-formalisation and bureaucracy, my focus is establishing whatever is appropriate and required in four areas of the business management concept: lead and direct (e.g. strategy, policy, culture), enablement (systems and tools, people, training, etc.), delivery (the different intelligence processes, analysis, delivery, and especially use), and measurement & analysis & improvement.

 

 

 

2. The analytical process.

 

 

 

In terms of point 2., I have found the work done by CIA and RAND to be of great value (e.g. psychology of intelligence analysis, etc.). Their work also touches on many culture and management issues. At a recent presentation by intelligence officials in the South African government, it was enlightening for me to see some of the similarities between the government and private sector in terms of e.g. the need of some level of governance and assurance. So I would very much like to see the CI BOK to incorporate the best appropriate learnings from other security and intelligence (as well as management) fields and research that would help in "sorting out the above two issues"! Well, as far as they can be sorted out!

Add a Comment
Hotkeys: Hold CTRL +   X Cut   Copy   V Past   Bold   Underline   Italic   Z Undo   Y Redo   
CAPTCHA
   Type the word you see on the left in the box below. More Info
   

or Cancel